Google★★★★★
“Perfect central location, gorgeous photos match the room.”
Location
Gilded Fox Boutique Hotel
Verified ownerBoutique Hotel · Lisbon, Portugal
Score computed 8/20/2026 · 1,215 reviews across 8 platforms · weighted rating 93/100 · 100% data coverage
…
Signal profile
Get the full report in your inbox
We’ll email the complete score report for Gilded Fox Boutique Hotel — strengths, watchouts and what to fix first — so you can share it with your team.
Detailed property report
Generated for Gilded Fox Boutique Hotel · 8 platforms · 1,215 reviews
Gilded Fox Boutique Hotel scores 83/100 (Good). Its strongest signal is review volume (100), while review velocity (31) holds it back most.
Market position
12 pts above the 10-property average
beats 1 of 10 peers · 13/13 criteria above average
Peer benchmark
71avg · best 86
Score trend
History builds up as the daily worker runs.
What's working well
14Signals that lend the property credibility — plus the services guests praise most.
Top strengths
9- Review volume100
A strong, trustworthy base of guest reviews to study.
- Online presence100
Your profile, website and directories are complete and visible.
- Photos & media95
Strong, current photo and media coverage on your listings.
- Rating quality93
Guests rate you well across your live channels. Keep the standards up.
- Response rate87
You reply to nearly every guest, and guests notice.
- Amenities & facilities85
The amenities you advertise are consistently delivered.
- Guest experience84
Service, cleanliness, value, location and facilities land well.
- Class & recognition81
What you advertise matches the class you actually deliver.
- Platform spread80
Your listing is visible across many major platforms.
Well-reviewed services
5- Staff & service92
scored 92/100 from guest sub-scores — a real strength on this stay.
- Cleanliness90
scored 90/100 from guest sub-scores — a real strength on this stay.
- Value for money70
scored 70/100 from guest sub-scores — a real strength on this stay.
- Location88
scored 88/100 from guest sub-scores — a real strength on this stay.
- Facilities80
scored 80/100 from guest sub-scores — a real strength on this stay.
Where attention goes
4The signals and services holding the overall score back — fix these first.
Critical
1- Review velocity31
New reviews have slowed, which makes the listing look stale.
To watch
3- Direct bookings50
Heavy OTA dependence is squeezing your margins.
- Sustainability55
Eco credentials are not surfaced — an easy credibility win.
- Accessibility60
Limited accessibility excludes a meaningful share of guests.
Score breakdown
Rating quality22%
Review volume13%
Review velocity8%
Response rate6%
Platform spread5%
Guest experience16%
Online presence8%
Amenities & facilities5%
Photos & media5%
Sustainability4%
Accessibility3%
Direct bookings3%
Class & recognition2%
Vs market
Dataset average
71/ 100
Best property
86
Above market average
Rating quality93
Review volume100
Review velocity31
Response rate87
Platform spread80
Guest experience84
Online presence100
Amenities & facilities85
Photos & media95
Sustainability55
Accessibility60
Direct bookings50
Class & recognition81
Reviews by platform
Google
230 reviews
4.7/5
19 in 30d
Booking.com
310 reviews
9.4/10
28 in 30d
TripAdvisor
180 reviews
4.6/5
12 in 30d
Expedia
95 reviews
4.5/5
7 in 30d
Airbnb
140 reviews
4.8/5
10 in 30d
Agoda
80 reviews
9.2/10
5 in 30d
Hotels.com
120 reviews
4.6/5
8 in 30d
Vrbo
No listing found
—
Hostelworld
No listing found
—
Trip.com
60 reviews
4.5/5
4 in 30d
What guests are saying
3 positive0 negative100% positive overall
Booking.com★★★★★
“Beautiful photos and amenities, but you can hear the corridor.”
Facilities
TripAdvisor★★★★★
“Friendly staff and excellent value for such a central spot.”
Staff & serviceValue for moneyLocation